Celiac Disease
The regular cooking of food, along with the formation of tribes and other modern behaviors, has enabled Homo sapiens to occupy almost every ecosystem on the face of the Earth, and when nothing else could be found to eat, it seemed that grass seeds could be cooked and eaten. Unfortunately, many people, when they started cooking and eating grass seeds, became sick and died.
Hominins, like their ape forebears, had seldom eaten grass seeds, and even when they had eaten grass, they most likely avoided eating the seeds, which were generally protected by bristly pods. Grass seeds contain special proteins, called glutens, that are found nowhere else on Earth, and some people were not able to completely metabolize them. Protein fragments that remained after incomplete metabolization made some people sick, and reduced their viability. Since this ability to safely metabolize grass seeds was associated with certain genes and gene combinations, genes that contributed to their disability were steadily eliminated among people who regularly ate cooked grass seeds --among the genes that were gradually eliminated from these populations were the HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 haplotypes.
But why do grass seeds contain glutens? Glutens are complex proteins that constitute tiny cages that can sequester liquids and dissolved solids (and occasionally gasses) inside them. As the ground warms in late spring and the earth quickly dries after a late spring rain, (as is common in the northern Mesopotamia and Anatolia) the water which is released from the tiny cages helps the seeds to sprout.
The Younger Dryas and the comet
The Younger Dryas was the most recent (the youngest, in a geological sense) of three episodes of cooling that interrupted the warming trend that followed the Last Glacial Maximum. (The Last Glacial Maximum occurred about 20,000 years ago.) Volcanism might have played a major part in causing the Younger Dryas, but this episode had a dramatic start, about 12,975 years ago, when a comet shredded into tiny fragments in the Earth's atmosphere and pieces of it smashed into the Earth.
The dense cloud of tiny fragments from the comet hung in the atmosphere and the stratosphere for many years, and at first virtually none of the sun's light reached ground level. Gradually, some of the larger particles fell out, leaving a thick haze, but by that time most of the smaller plant life like grasses were dead. Even the leaves of trees were turning yellow and falling to the ground, and many herbivores were starving to death.
People who at that time lived by hunting the animals that starved to death at that time had seen the fireworks in the sky and knew that the cataclysm had hit them from the sky, and when the air had cleared to the point where they could make out the stars at night they took careful note of the positions of the galaxies. Two thousand years later their descendants built a monument or temple or observatory on top of a small mountain in the region (today in southeastern Turkey) to commemorate the event and to observe the heavens and try to discern what the movements of stars and planets meant.
A series of such monuments were constructed at the highest point on this hill or mountain, known to the Turks as Gobekli Tepe, or "Potbellied Hill". (As each new monument was built, the previous one was filled in, creating a mound where the old monument had been. The total of the filled-in monuments formed a circular mound that looked like a navel on top of the mountain.)
Within one of these monuments archaeologists found a pillar, known as the "Vulture Stone", on which had been recorded the positions of the constellations as they had been observed soon after the comet had struck. This stone tells us when, within about a hundred and fifty years, the comet had struck the Earth.
The Great Sphynx
Many people thought that the Great Sphynx of Egypt was a product of Egyptian Civilization, but then it was pointed out that the Sphynx shows signs of having been subject to heavy rainfall over the course of thousands of years, whereas Egypt has been very dry for many thousands of years. The Sphynx must have been carved about 12,000 years ago, contemporarily with the construction of Gobekli Tepe, or even earlier. So, why was the great figure carved out of sandstone, and what did it represent?
The Sphynx was carved out of solid rock during the Younger Dryas, 12,000 years ago, but Egypt was on the edge of the tropic zone, and rainfall was heavy after that -- as is evident from the water erosion that has affected the surface of the Sphynx. The sun was more directly overhead in northern Egypt than it was in Anatolia, and grass would grow well there even if the skies were darkened by volcanism and cloudy skies during the Younger Dryas.
However, Egypt might have been affected in the early years of the Younger Dryas, and if there had been a die-off of herbivores in northern Egypt the hunter-gatherers there might have been reduced to cooking and eating grass seeds, like the hunter-gatherers of Anatolia. If so, the Great Sphynx might have represented a hunting god who, it was hoped, would ensure that the animals would return, or would not again vanish.
But who carved the magnificent monument? Is it possible that it was carved by a single Michelangelo?
Grass-seed consumption
Herbivores became so scarce in the region that people gave up hunting in favor of gathering, processing and cooking grass seeds. No grasses had been domesticated up to that time, so the seeds that were gathered were of wild grasses. Even grasses grew poorly in the dim light, but the crops of grass seeds were better and grew more consistently than any other food that people could find.
Since the gathering of plant foods was women's work, men spent their time chipping stone vessels out of stone for storing, cooking and serving grass seeds. Mush, made from grass seeds, was often the only food available to the human population.
We tend to think that the Neolithic, or "New Stone Age", was a time when people made new kinds of tools (such as composite tools) in order to make or construct new kinds of things (such as structures), but I think the period is better characterized as one in which time hung heavy on men's hands; their primary function had been taken away from them, first by a massive die-off of the animals that they hunted and then by the domestication of animals. Even after wild animal populations recovered, men were often more useful for guarding domesticated animals and stores of grass seeds than for hunting wild animals and bringing back the carcasses. Moreover women, rather than men, often cared for the domesticated animals.
Even as the Younger Dryas waned, human populations burgeoned because grass seeds were so rich in energy; shortage of energy foods had always been the limiting factor in the growth of human populations
The chipping of storage and cooking vessels out of stone was not enough to keep men busy, nor did they like to do it, so they often spent their time trying to solve the riddle of what had befallen them. Men with time on their hands sat in groups at night to watch the sky and report what they saw; those who were very good at this then became professional astronomers, and were paid to watch the sky every night and analyze what they saw; other men were paid by the community to build observatories, based on various designs, to help the astronomers do their work. Their work was to discover the cause of what had happened.
Women were no longer dependent on men. Indeed, men were dependent on women, because men refused to do the women's work of gathering, processing and cooking grass seeds. Moreover, men lost their main remaining usefulness when women started to make pottery. Women ruled their households, and women in the village communities ruled the men, rather than the reverse.
The idealized art of the earliest farming communities often feature women with one arm draped across the back of a man, as she owned him. The men simply folded their hands in front of them; they had nothing to do.
Self-domestication and farming
Humans were already super-competitive among the medium-sized species of the Earth when increased consumption of grass seeds and other farm products led to even higher population densities among them. This, in turn, led to further intensification of self-domestication.
High population density and stable societies had prompted modern qualities of mind to emerge, especially along the southern coast of Africa and in other refugia, and the same high population densities had caused these same populations to be strongly affected by self-domestication.
One result of self-domestication was that juvenile characteristics such as playfulness tended to be retained into adulthood, and this playfulness is an aspect of the modern mind. Another result of self-domestication was a longer period of immaturity early in life, which prompted more extensive brain remodeling during that period. This also helped to drive the emergence of the modern mind. Thus, we can see that self-domestication and the modern mind were (and are) deeply entangled with each other.
Genocide
The alluvial plain of Mesopotamia is much too big and deep to excavate the whole thing, so there is no practical way to determine archaeologically just how ancient Sumer really was; but grasses most likely were domesticated as early on the alluvial plain as anywhere; conditions were often perfect on this alluvial plain, near some of the earliest Sumerian sites and ideal for the growth of gasses and other crops. Wherever there was enough rainfall, and along riverbanks, agriculturalists could have easily grown crops there without creating an irrigation system.
The sowing, reaping, processing and cooking of grass seeds was women' work -- the work of men was hunting. Moreover, as well-fed human populations increased, and it became necessary to travel long distances to find animals to hunt, domesticated sheep and goats (mostly cared for by women) made it unnecessary for men to do anything at all besides the tedious chore of chipping cooking and serving vessels out of stone.
Consequently, men began to look for other things to do, such as hunting down and slaughtering the archaic Homo sapiens from the southern swamplands who had formed a habit of stealing crops and domesticated animals from the farming communities.
The hunters, who used bow-and-arrow killing systems, far outnumbered the women and children who had been stealing the crops and animals. After the thieves had been wiped out the hunters went after those who tried to hide in the swampland.
Incidentally, a man living in the United States has been found to be a direct descendant, in the male line of descent, of the archaic Homo sapiens who continued to live in or near the swamplands of southern Mesopotamia after others had populated Africa. His ancestors may have been among those who survived by abandoning the swampland altogether and subsequently avoided all contact with modern humans. (They may have escaped along the shoreline.)
Otzi the Ice Man
Otzi was chased into the Italian Alps and shot inn the back by the very people with whom he had grown up, but why?
After chasing him into the Alps, the people with whom he had grown up shot him in the back with an arrow, and then carefully buried him in a glacier. What crime had he committed?
The most likely explanation is that he had returned to the place of his birth, raped a woman, and then run. He had probably done this same thing before; but he was growing old, and a younger man took out after him, ran him down, and killed him. Why had he chosen to live as a hunter, rather than to sit at home and guard a woman's precious store of grass seeds? Perhaps he was bored?
In any case, he was probably not unique. His withdrawal from society and his execution seem very natural even to us, and we can see that such events, repeated many times, would remove people with his inclinations from the gene pool. The result was a new round of self domestication among early farm populations which resulted in women as well as men becoming more docile and immature. Accompanying these behaviors were new physical characteristics that have been identifies as domestication syndrome.
Stonehenge
The farmers who pushed into England, where Stonehenge is located, soon outnumbered the hunter-gatherer population on the island. This was because domesticated grass seeds are such a dependable food source of energy for human populations. (Shortage of such foods usually limits population growth.) But the building of monuments is men's work, and Stonehenge was built by men who had nothing better to do.
Most of Europe was invaded a few thousand years later by aggressive pastoralists, but England and Ireland largely escaped this second wave of invaders because pastoralists depend on domesticated animals for their livelihood, and their animals couldn't swim well enough to reach the islands. Celts, however, who were descendants of the aggressive pastoralists, did invade both England and Ireland after conquering all of Europe and taking up agriculture themselves.
By the time The Celts invaded England, Stonehenge had been under construction for hundreds of years. It was still missing the tall, thin Bluestones that now form a second concentric ring inside the ring of sandstone giants, but it was considered to be complete. Finished.
With the coming of the Celts, the aggressive descendants of animal herders, the local farmers were pushed off their land and forced to survive on the fringes of a new society. As always happens, the invaders married local women, because invaders are invariably young and have no wives. They are also heedless of injuries that they might suffer as they go about depriving others of their livelihoods, and they often die young,
A new elite gradually took control of the English countryside and then financed further construction on Stonehenge, which included bringing in the tall Bluestones.
Prospectors on Majorca?
Prospectors looking for flint were the first inhabitants of some of the islands at the eastern end of the Mediterranean Sea, but who were the mysterious people who moved to Majorca, at the western end of the Mediterranean Sea about 6,000 years ago, and then abandoned the island, leaving few artifacts behind. A good guess is that they were prospectors looking for tin deposits.
Tin is a very rare metal even today, and the people of that time needed it so that they could alloy it with copper to make bronze. It is known as the Bronze Age, but until recently, nobody knew where the ancient world got its tin. We now know that it was shipped clear from Wales so that metallurgists in the Middle East could use it to make things like knives and swords. Nothing could match the strength and hardness of bronze, and whoever supplied it must have become fabulously rich.
After prospectors were done looking for tin on Majorca, they could use the island as a way station for explorations further afield.
Greed, murder and retribution?
One of the graves that were excavated by archaeologists near Stonehenge (rather than in Stonehenge itself) may have belonged to a shipping magnate whose family had profited from the discovery of tin deposits in Wales, and I will now tell a story about his grave and that of a close relative of his.
This man was obviously very rich, judging by his grave goods, and he had eclectic Continental tastes. Further investigation revealed that he had been born in the vicinity of Greece and had been brought to the Isle of Britain while he was a young boy. (That helps to explain his Continental tastes.)
The date of his death and interment would indicate that he could have been among those who had been involved in bringing bluestones, the tall blue stones in the inner circle, to Stonehenge. The possibility of such a connection was strengthened by the finding of another grave, about three miles away, that contained the remains of a close relative of his, perhaps a son or a nephew.
This young man, who had been perhaps 25 years of age when he died, was born in Wales (near the site of a second monument that had been robbed of the bluestones) and had a gold hair ornament that was identical to the two that were among the grave goods of the older man. But his had been stuffed into his mouth!
Another interesting thing about the two graves is that the older man had a large number of finely crafted arrows in his possession, as well as a bow with which to shoot them -- the younger man had no such weapons in his possession.
The two men were buried several miles apart, and this brings up the question of why the younger man was not buried nearby and likewise furnished with weapons, so he could help to defend the older man?
The deaths are suspicious because of the immense wealth of the two close relatives and the early death of the younger man. There might have been a quarrel between the two over the wealth possessed by the older man.
The place of origin of the older man, in the Aegean region (where bronze was produced by alloying copper with tin) suggests that perhaps his family had been involved in the transport of copper and tin from the Isle of Britain to the eastern Mediterranean. (Both copper and tin were mined to the west of Stonehenge.)
The Isle of Britain was the only known source of tin in the ancient world, so it must have been immensely valuable by the time it reached the eastern Mediterranean region. And I don't doubt that the older man, being a shipping magnate, could have paid for the bluestones, and the cost of transporting them to the Salisbury Plain, without blinking an eye. Yet he and presumably his family preferred a burial site that was outside of Stonehenge.
Merging of peoples and technologies
In parallel with the early phases of Stonehenge, the growing of grass and other crops was spreading across Eurasia. Moreover, new fishing technologies were under development, particularly in Island Southeast Asia. As people moved about, these two technologies came together so that farmers could obtain fish from the fishermen and fishermen could obtain millet and rice seeds and other agricultural products from farmers.
Intentional spreading of grass seeds seems to have started in the Middle East and spread from there. It might have been spread into some parts of Asia, at least, by hunter-gatherers and even sea people who had picked up some knowledge of farming. The desire of women to start their own gardens could lead to new agricultural developments, based on new agricultural products, in new places. Agriculture spread west to the Nile Valley and east to the vicinity of the Indus River, and eventually reached the eastern end of the Eurasian landmass.
As people moved about and came into contact with and merged with others who used different technologies, they expanded their mastery of various technologies. For instance, people who had been trapped on offshore islands when sea levels had declined built boats, acquired fishing skills, and then moved to the mainland and interbred with other modern people who grew grass and other crops. Some of the resulting mixed-race people took up farming, becoming millet farmers or rice farmers, while others were primarily fishermen.
As population density increased in some parts of the far east, people's skins became lighter because of lack of Vitamin D in their diets, but bleaching of people's skin did not reach the extreme of what occurred in Europe.
Migrations
Fishing skills, developed in Island Southeast Asia or in mainland estuaries may have prompted some people to travel offshore along the coast, cross over to North America, and follow the coast to the tip of South America. Archaeologists found evidence of such movements on offshore islands and near the tip of South America.
Other people from Island Southeast Asia went north and interbred with people from Siberia. Part of the resulting mixed-race population then moved across a land bridge (where the Bering Strait is today) to North America.
There is evidence that some ancient people from Australia or Papua New Guinea might have beat these migrations when they sailed or drifted clear across the wide Pacific and found themselves in America. This early migration is evidenced by signals of Australian or New Guinean ancestry, as well as elevated levels of DNA snippets from Homo neanderthalensis and Homo longi/denisova, that show up in ancient and modern genomes of some people in Panama and South America but not North America.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.