Tailless monkeys
We evolved from apes. Apes evolved from monkeys, and they are larger than monkeys. The larger size of apes made it easier for them to wade in swamps, where they found much of their food. They ate floating vegetation and other things from the swamp, like crustaceans that they found in reedbeds.
Tails had helped the smaller monkeys to maintain balance in the trees, but presented a problem for apes, whose short tails simply picked up parasites from the water or tempted fish and turtles to snack on them, so evolution ditched the tails altogether. Apes are tailless.
Twelve million years ago the swamps and humid forests of Europe were ideal for apes. Each kind of ape had its own special features. They varied in size, and they varied in their modes of travel, through the trees and along the ground. Of the many kinds of apes were bipedal apes, who habitually stood and moved in an upright position. Among these were the ancestors of chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans. These bipedal apes were also our own ancestors.
Danuvius guggenmosi
Danuvius guddenmosi were possibly ancestors of ours. About 11.6 million years ago, near the beginning of the gradual change in climate, they left their fossils in central Europe – specifically, their fossils were found in Bavaria. When these apes were on the ground they walked in a fully upright position, as gibbons do today, so I will call them bipedal apes.
Starting about ten or eleven million years ago the climate of Europe began to change -- it grew cooler, drier, and more seasonal. Fewer trees produced succulent fruits, so the apes started to rely more on harder foods like mollusks, nuts, roots and underground stems.
The apes sometimes damaged their teeth on these harder foods. Those with damaged teeth often failed to pass on their genes, because damage to their teeth made it more difficult for them to eat. So, the apes came to have thicker and harder enamel on their teeth. This is a hallmark of hominins, who were our more recent ancestors. We, ourselves, have very hard, thick enamel on our teeth, and so did Danuvius guggenmosi.
As the European climate changed, trees that bore succulent fruits throughout the year were replaced by others that produced only nuts, seeds or cones, or produced succulent fruits only in summer and fall. Moreover, as Europe became more seasonal, trees no longer produced soft, easily-chewed leaves in the winter season. These were among the reasons why our ancestors were ultimately the only apes who survived in Europe. (The ancestors of chimpanzees apparently crossed a mostly dried-out Mediterranean Basin, and survived in Africa.)
Rudapithecus hungaricus
About 1.6 million years after the Danuvius guggenmosi fossil was laid down in central Europe, a similar fossil was deposited further south and east, in what is now eastern Hungary. This hominin, perhaps a later model of the same species, was given the name Rudapithecus hungaricus, and also must have included nuts in their diets. They must have learned to crack nuts open by hitting them with hammerstones.
When they could find neither fruits nor nuts to eat, they might have descended from the trees and found their food in shallow water. In reedbeds they could have found small crustaceans that hid there. Edible storage organs of water plants could also be found in shallow water.
Like Danuvius gugenmosi, they were bipedal, and this often saved them from being eaten when they were attacked by predators. A quadrupedal predator who followed a bipedal ape into deep water would quickly lose his footing, and the ape could simply push the predator under the water and drown it.
Ouranopithecus
Fossils of Ouranopithecus macedonicus, dated at nine million years ago, were found in northern Greece. These hominins, like Rudapithecus hungaricus, preferred to forage in water, rather than in trees, except maybe in the summer and fall.
Many predators were very large, and the larger predators were dangerous to small apes even while the apes were wading in deep water. This circumstance had prompted the ancestors of Ouranopithecus to evolve to larger body sizes.
When an Ouranopithecus waded in water, he would waddle, swaying from side to side with each step. In other words, when he put his weight on his left leg he swayed to the left, and when he put his weight on his right leg he swayed to the right. But this swaying to the left and right slowed him down, so when he needed to take a cross-country hike, he would compensate for his wide hips by twisting his very flexible spine, clockwise or counterclockwise, with each step. This gave him an exaggerated swagger.
The reason Ouranopithecus did not evolve narrower hips -- like those of their descendants, the Australopithecines -- was that a shorter pelvic girdle would have narrowed the opening through which the birth canal had to pass, making it more difficult for a female Ouranopithecus to give birth.
Moreover, birth was already difficult for members of this species. This was because, as the ancestors of Ouranopithecus had evolved to a larger body size their pelvic girdle (the frame that supports the upper body) had rotated so as to better support their bigger, heavier upper body, and this had made it necessary for the birth canal to descend through the opening in it before turning toward the vagina, which of course opened toward the front of the body. This is similar to the arrangement in a modern human female's body.
Birth is difficult and dangerous for a modern human female. Likewise, the sharp turn in the birth canal made it more difficult for an Ouranopithecus to give birth; the fetus had to pass through a long, twisting birth canal, as does a human fetus when it is being born, and if it did not dive headfirst into the birth canal, as a human fetus does when it is being born, this endangered the lives of both the mother and the child.
Graecopithecus freybergensis
Seven million years ago Graecopithecus freybergensis lived just north of the Mediterranean Sea, and their fossils were found in Bulgaria and in Greece. Characteristics of their teeth indicate that they were closely related to the later hominins, and therefore must have been hominins themselves. Moreover, comparison of their teeth with those of Ouranopithecus macedonicus indicates that they were closely related to those earlier apes, as well, so hominins were most likely descendants of the bipedal apes of Europe. Graecopithecus freybergensis foraged in the surf and along the intertidal zone, on occasion, and they smashed shellfish that they found there, just as their ancestors had smashed the shells of edible nuts. They may have also learned to use a broken rock with a sharp edge to open a bivalve or pry a limpet loose from a rock.
Foraging in the surf and in the intertidal zone for crabs and shellfish would cause these hominins to ingest a lot of salt, so in the course of time they evolved genetically so that their sweat glands, kidneys and lachrymal glands were able to expel the excess salt from their bodies.
Sahelanthropus tchadensis
About the time that Graecopithecus freybergensus were developing semi-aquatic habits in the southern fringes of Europe, Sahelanthropus tchadensis were moving into Africa after crossing a mostly dried up Mediterranean Basin. The latter species were fully bipedal, like their ancestors; but unlike their ancestors, and ours (and Capuchin monkeys) they carried their heads somewhat forward. This enabled them to more effectively use their fangs for fighting and self-defense.
Sahelanthropus tchadensis were more likely ancestral to gorillas or chimpanzees than they are to hominins.
XXXand they avoided deep water. If a terrestrial predator surprised them while they were wading in water, they would simply lean forward, raise their head so they could see where they were going, and revert to a quadrupedal mode of escape, which of course could not lead into deep water. This difference led to a parting of the ways between our ancestors, who escaped into deep water, and our ape cousins, who reverted to a partially quadrupedal mode of locomotion as their body sizes increased and who even today cannot swim.XXX
XXXSahelanthropus tchadensis were more likely ancestral to gorillas or chimpanzees than to ourselves.XXX
Tailless monkeys
We evolved from apes. Apes evolved from monkeys, and they are larger than monkeys. The larger size of apes made it easier for them to wade in swamps, where they found much of their food. They ate floating vegetation and other things from the swamp, like crustaceans that they found in reedbeds.
Tails had helped the smaller monkeys to maintain balance in the trees, but presented a problem for apes, whose short tails simply picked up parasites from the water or tempted fish and turtles to snack on them, so evolution ditched the tails altogether. Apes are tailless.
Twelve million years ago the swamps and humid forests of Europe were ideal for apes. Each kind of ape had its own special features. They varied in size, and they varied in their modes of travel, through the trees and along the ground. Of the many kinds of apes were bipedal apes, who habitually stood and moved in an upright position. Among these were the ancestors of chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans. These bipedal apes were also our own ancestors.
Danuvius guggenmosi
Danuvius guddenmosi were possibly ancestors of ours. About 11.6 million years ago, near the beginning of the gradual change in climate, they left their fossils in central Europe – specifically, their fossils were found in Bavaria. When these apes were on the ground they walked in a fully upright position, as gibbons do today, so I will call them bipedal apes.
Starting about ten or eleven million years ago the climate of Europe began to change -- it grew cooler, drier, and more seasonal. Fewer trees produced succulent fruits, so the apes started to rely more on harder foods like mollusks, nuts, roots and underground stems.
The apes sometimes damaged their teeth on these harder foods. Those with damaged teeth often failed to pass on their genes, because damage to their teeth made it more difficult for them to eat. So, the apes came to have thicker and harder enamel on their teeth. This is a hallmark of hominins, who were our more recent ancestors. We, ourselves, have very hard, thick enamel on our teeth, and so did Danuvius guggenmosi.
As the European climate changed, trees that bore succulent fruits throughout the year were replaced by others that produced only nuts, seeds or cones, or produced succulent fruits only in summer and fall. Moreover, as Europe became more seasonal, trees no longer produced soft, easily-chewed leaves in the winter season. These were among the reasons why our ancestors were ultimately the only apes who survived in Europe. (The ancestors of chimpanzees apparently crossed a mostly dried-out Mediterranean Basin, and survived in Africa.)
Rudapithecus hungaricus
About 1.6 million years after the Danuvius guggenmosi fossil was laid down in central Europe, a similar fossil was deposited further south and east, in what is now eastern Hungary. This hominin, perhaps a later model of the same species, was given the name Rudapithecus hungaricus, and also must have included nuts in their diets. They must have learned to crack nuts open by hitting them with hammerstones.
When they could find neither fruits nor nuts to eat, they might have descended from the trees and found their food in shallow water. In reedbeds they could have found small crustaceans that hid there. Edible storage organs of water plants could also be found in shallow water.
Like Danuvius gugenmosi, they were bipedal, and this often saved them from being eaten when they were attacked by predators. A quadrupedal predator who followed a bipedal ape into deep water would quickly lose his footing, and the ape could simply push the predator under the water and drown it.
Ouranopithecus
Fossils of Ouranopithecus macedonicus, dated at nine million years ago, were found in northern Greece. These hominins, like Rudapithecus hungaricus, preferred to forage in water, rather than in trees, except maybe in the summer and fall.
Many predators were very large, and the larger predators were dangerous to small apes even while the apes were wading in deep water. This circumstance had prompted the ancestors of Ouranopithecus to evolve to larger body sizes.
When an Ouranopithecus waded in water, he would waddle, swaying from side to side with each step. In other words, when he put his weight on his left leg he swayed to the left, and when he put his weight on his right leg he swayed to the right. But this swaying to the left and right slowed him down, so when he needed to take a cross-country hike, he would compensate for his wide hips by twisting his very flexible spine, clockwise or counterclockwise, with each step. This gave him an exaggerated swagger.
The reason Ouranopithecus did not evolve narrower hips -- like those of their descendants, the Australopithecines -- was that a shorter pelvic girdle would have narrowed the opening through which the birth canal had to pass, making it more difficult for a female Ouranopithecus to give birth.
Moreover, birth was already difficult for members of this species. This was because, as the ancestors of Ouranopithecus had evolved to a larger body size their pelvic girdle (the frame that supports the upper body) had rotated so as to better support their bigger, heavier upper body, and this had made it necessary for the birth canal to descend through the opening in it before turning toward the vagina, which of course opened toward the front of the body. This is similar to the arrangement in a modern human female's body.
Birth is difficult and dangerous for a modern human female. Likewise, the sharp turn in the birth canal made it more difficult for an Ouranopithecus to give birth; the fetus had to pass through a long, twisting birth canal, as does a human fetus when it is being born, and if it did not dive headfirst into the birth canal, as a human fetus does when it is being born, this endangered the lives of both the mother and the child.
Graecopithecus freybergensis
Seven million years ago Graecopithecus freybergensis lived just north of the Mediterranean Sea, and their fossils were found in Bulgaria and in Greece. Characteristics of their teeth indicate that they were closely related to the later hominins, and therefore must have been hominins themselves. Moreover, comparison of their teeth with those of Ouranopithecus macedonicus indicates that they were closely related to those earlier apes, as well, so hominins were most likely descendants of the bipedal apes of Europe. Graecopithecus freybergensis foraged in the surf and along the intertidal zone, on occasion, and they smashed shellfish that they found there, just as their ancestors had smashed the shells of edible nuts. They may have also learned to use a broken rock with a sharp edge to open a bivalve or pry a limpet loose from a rock.
Foraging in the surf and in the intertidal zone for crabs and shellfish would cause these hominins to ingest a lot of salt, so in the course of time they evolved genetically so that their sweat glands, kidneys and lachrymal glands were able to expel the excess salt from their bodies.
Sahelanthropus tchadensis
About the time that Graecopithecus freybergensus were developing semi-aquatic habits in the southern fringes of Europe, Sahelanthropus tchadensis were moving into Africa after crossing a mostly dried up Mediterranean Basin. The latter species were fully bipedal, like their ancestors; but unlike their ancestors, and ours (and Capuchin monkeys) they carried their heads somewhat forward. This enabled them to more effectively use their fangs for fighting and self-defense.
Sahelanthropus tchadensis were more likely ancestral to gorillas or chimpanzees than they are to hominins.
XXXand they avoided deep water. If a terrestrial predator surprised them while they were wading in water, they would simply lean forward, raise their head so they could see where they were going, and revert to a quadrupedal mode of escape, which of course could not lead into deep water. This difference led to a parting of the ways between our ancestors, who escaped into deep water, and our ape cousins, who reverted to a partially quadrupedal mode of locomotion as their body sizes increased and who even today cannot swim.XXX
XXXSahelanthropus tchadensis were more likely ancestral to gorillas or chimpanzees than to ourselves.XXX
Skydiving is an experience unlike any other, and I finally worked up the courage to take the leap. In this post, I share my thrilling experience and offer insight into what it takes to conquer your fear and take the plunge.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.